Please read the information carefully
We welcome prospective authors to submit their original papers, which should not be under
consideration for publication elsewhere. These papers should adhere to the standard format provided
and detail novel theoretical and experimental research. Authors are encouraged to submit papers of any
length, inclusive of figures, tables, and references.
Submitted manuscripts will be evaluated based on several criteria: originality, significance, interest,
clarity, relevance, correctness, and presentation quality. We look forward to receiving your
contributions and reviewing them in accordance with these guidelines.
Once the NIJOSTAM peer-review committee has accepted a paper, the author will receive a notification
by e-mail and on the author's profile account.
The NILEST Journal of Science, Technology, and Management (NIJOSTAM) is dedicated to the publication of top-tier research papers in the field of Science, Technology and Management. Our journal prides itself on its inclusive approach, where papers are not excluded based on their novelty. Instead, we prioritize technical correctness and scientific merit, making it our mission to disseminate knowledge that advances the fields of interest.
Furthermore, we actively encourage the submission of reports on negative results, recognizing the value of such contributions to the scientific community. NIJOSTAM is committed to maintaining high standards through quality control and operates as an open, peer-reviewed, open-access international publication.
Our open-access model means that all content is readily available to users without any associated fees, enabling readers to freely access, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to, or employ the full texts of articles for lawful purposes, all without the need for prior permission from the publisher or authors. This aligns with the principles outlined in the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI).
Each issue of our journal features a minimum of five papers, and our continuous publishing system ensures that all officially accepted manuscripts are promptly published online. This "state-of-the-art running issue" concept minimizes waiting times for authors, allowing their work to reach a global audience more rapidly. NIJOSTAM embraces an international perspective, transcending geographical boundaries to serve the global scientific community.
1. Original research papers:
Manuscripts containing novel empirical data that have not been previously published, except in abstract form, are encouraged. We also welcome submissions reporting null or negative findings, as well as replications and refutations. Typically, these papers should be limited to 25 double-spaced pages, including references, and should feature no more than 15 figures or tables. We recommend a word count between 3,000 and 6,000 words, encompassing all components of the manuscript.
2. Short Research Articles:
Short Research Articles, also known as Research Notes, are concise research papers focused on a single discovery or the results of a one-year experiment in the case of agricultural studies. These articles are designed to be presented with one or two supporting illustrations, such as figures or tables, along with detailed lab protocols. It is also permissible to condense conference posters or internal meeting presentations into Short Research Articles or Research Notes.
To ensure that readers and peer reviewers can fully comprehend the work, it is often necessary to include additional details, especially in the methods, results description, and discussion/conclusion sections. A recommended length for these articles falls within the range of 3000 to 4000 words, supplemented by 3 to 4 figures and/or tables, and supported by 15 to 20 key references.
3. Short communications:
Short Communications represent urgent messages conveying vital preliminary findings that exhibit exceptional originality and hold substantial interest, with the potential to significantly influence the journal's subject area. These concise reports aim to establish a 'proof of principle.' Authors are strongly encouraged to subsequently submit an Original Research Paper to the journal, building upon their Short Communication. While there is no strict page constraint for Short Communications, we recommend a length of 2500-3500 words, accompanied by 2-3 figures and/or tables, and a reference list of 15-20 key sources.
4. Review papers:
The papers in question will not feature empirical data gathered by the authors themselves. Instead, they will encompass discussions regarding papers already published and data collected within a particular field. We recommend a length of 5000 to 9000 words, which should encompass 50 to 150 references, along with the potential inclusion of 3 to 5 figures and/or tables, if deemed necessary.
5. Minireview papers:
Minireviews serve as concise historical perspectives or summarizations of advancements in rapidly evolving domains that fall under the journal's purview. These writings should draw from previously published articles and are not intended for the dissemination of unpublished data. Minireviews can explore any topic within the journal's scope, with the primary aim being to offer a clear and succinct overview of a specific field accessible to all readers. We recommend a word count of 3,000 to 6,000 words, comprising 30 to 70 references, along with the inclusion of 2 to 3 figures and/or tables if deemed necessary.
6. Letter to the Editor:
A letter addressed to the editor serves as a channel for communication between the author of an article and the readers of a journal. It fosters an ongoing discourse regarding the content within the journal. While it may not constitute original research, a letter can offer fresh perspectives, rectify inaccuracies, propose alternative theories, or seek clarifications on the journal's published content. Letters to the Editor are subject to publication consideration, albeit subject to potential editing and abridgment, as long as they do not contain material that has been previously submitted or published elsewhere.
In the context of letters referencing a journal article, the word count must not exceed 600 words, excluding references. This word limit is also applicable to letters unrelated to a specific journal article, again excluding references. Each letter is allowed to include a maximum of eight references and one figure or table. Additionally, no more than four authors may sign a single letter. To ensure transparency, any financial associations or potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed. This type of article is subject to a comprehensive peer-review process, and publication charges may apply.
Online submission of manuscripts is strongly recommended. Please submit your article through the
author's portal. After submission, a manuscript number will be communicated to the corresponding
author within 48 hours.
For submission-related problems or all other correspondence, please get in touch with the editorial
office at info@nijostam.org.
The manuscript should be written in English with a simple layout. The text should be prepared in single column format. Bold face, italics, subscripts, superscripts etc. can be used.
The text, excluding the abstract, can be divided into sections with brief headings if required.
1. Case Reports should follow the structure of Abstract, Introduction, Presentation of Case, Discussion, Conclusion, Acknowledgements, Competing Interests, Authors' Contributions, Consent (where applicable), Ethical approval (where applicable), and References plus figures and tables. The Case report's abstract (250 words or less) should have the following sections: Aims, Presentation of Case, Discussion and Conclusion. Only Case Reports have word limits: Papers should not exceed 2000 words, 20 references or 5 figures. Other Types of papers have no word limits.
2. Review papers may have different headings of the sections and are exempted from following these suggestions.
3. Research Papers and Short Notes should follow the structure of Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Conclusion, Acknowledgements, Competing Interests, Authors' Contributions, Consent (where applicable), Ethical approval (where applicable), and References plus figures and tables.)
The title page should contain a brief title, name(s) of author(s) and their affiliations. The title should be without any abbreviations and it should enlighten the contents of the paper. All affiliations should be provided with a lower-case superscript letter just after the author's name and in front of the appropriate address.
The name of the corresponding author should be indicated along with telephone and fax numbers (with country and area code) along with full postal address and e-mail address.
The abstract should be concise and informative. It should be at most 250 words in length. It should briefly describe the purpose of the work, techniques and methods used, major findings with important data and conclusions. Different sub-sections should be used, including Aim, Study Design, Methodology, Results, and Conclusion. No references should be cited in this part. Generally, non-standard abbreviations should not be used; if necessary, they should be clearly defined in the abstract at first use.
Immediately after the abstract, about 4-5 keywords should be given. Use of abbreviations should be avoided, only standard abbreviations, well known in the established area may be used, if appropriate. These keywords will be used for indexing.
Non-standard abbreviations should be listed and full form of each abbreviation should be given in parentheses at first use in the text.
The introduction section serves as a foundational framework for the research endeavor. It delineates the factual context, articulates a clearly defined problem, proposes a solution, offers a concise literature review, and elucidates the work's scope and justification.
In this section, comprehensive details are provided to facilitate the replication of the experiment. Any previously published methodologies are referenced, while significant deviations from established methods or the introduction of novel approaches are described in depth. Sub-sections are included for clarity, and tables and figures are integrated seamlessly within the text. Discussion surrounding tables and figures is advised to precede their presentation, with each table being sufficiently self-explanatory even without direct textual reference. Double spacing is uniformly maintained, encompassing table headings and footnotes, with headings above the table and footnotes below, denoted by superscript lowercase letters. Figure captions are separated from the figure itself and should be succinct. Figures should be self-explanatory, and any symbols or abbreviations in illustrations must be explicitly defined. Figure legends are positioned below the figures.
For medical papers, adherence to specific reporting guidelines is recommended:
The results section should deliver a concise, clear description of the findings. Results for different parameters may be organized under subheadings or in separate paragraphs, and reference to table or figure numbers should be provided in parentheses for improved comprehension. The discussion should not merely reiterate the results but should instead offer a detailed interpretation of the data, highlighting the significance of the study's findings. Citations should be used to substantiate the findings. If appropriate, the results and discussion can be presented as distinct sections.
Tables and figures are embedded within the text, with discussion preceding their presentation. Tables should be comprehensible independently, without the need for accompanying text references. Consistent double spacing should be maintained, encompassing table headings and footnotes. Table headings are situated above the respective table, while footnotes are placed below with superscript lowercase letters. Each figure is equipped with a separate, succinct caption, located apart from the figure itself. Figures should be designed to be self-explanatory, and information presented in figures should not be duplicated in tables. All symbols and abbreviations employed in illustrations must be explicitly defined, with figure legends positioned below the figures.
Guideline for Reporting P Values
When reporting P values, observe the following guidelines:
The conclusion section succinctly summarizes the major findings of the study.
Following the conclusion section, a brief acknowledgment section can be included to recognize individuals or entities that contributed to manuscript preparation, funding, or other forms of support. All sources of funding should be disclosed, specifying the role of the funding agency, if any, in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. If there was no involvement from study sponsors, this should be explicitly stated.
A declaration of any competing interests is mandatory. Authors must disclose financial and personal relationships with individuals or organizations that could potentially bias their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, grants, or other forms of funding. If no competing interests exist, authors should explicitly state: "Authors have declared that no competing interests exist."
This section is compulsory for medical journals. Other journals may require this section if found suitable. If human subjects are involved, informed consent, protection of privacy, and other human rights are further criteria against which the manuscript will be judged. It should provide a statement to confirm that the authors have obtained all necessary ethical approval from suitable Institutional or State or National or International Committee. This confirms either that this study is not against the public interest, or that the release of information is allowed by legislation.
All manuscripts which deal with animal subjects must be approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Ethical Committee, or an Animal Utilization Study Committee. , and this statement, and approval number, must accompany the submission. If required, the author should be ready to submit a scanned copy of the IRB or Ethical Committee Approval at any stage of publication (Pre of post publication stage). The manuscript should contain information about any post-operative care and pain management for the animals.
For manuscripts involving animal experiments, Authors may use the following wording for this section “All authors hereby declare that "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws where applicable. All experiments have been examined and approved by the appropriate ethics committee”
All manuscripts which deal with the study of human subjects must be accompanied by Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethical Committee Approval, or the national or regional equivalent. The name of the Board or Committee giving approval and the study number assigned must accompany the submission. If required, the author should be ready to submit a scanned copy of the IRB or Ethical Committee Approval at any stage of publication (Pre or post publication stage).
For manuscripts involving human experiments, Authors may use the following wording for this section: “All authors hereby declare that all experiments have been examined and approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.”
References must be listed at the end of the manuscript and numbered in the order that they appear in the text. Every reference referred in the text must also present in the reference list and vice versa. In the text, citations should be indicated by the reference number in brackets [3].
Only published or accepted manuscripts should be included in the reference list. Articles submitted for publication, unpublished findings and personal communications should not be included in the reference list but may be mentioned in the text.
All references should follow the following style:
For Published paper:
1. Hilly M, Adams ML, Nelson SC. A study of digit fusion in the mouse embryo. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32(4):489-98.
Note: List the first six authors followed by et al.
Note: Use of DOI number for the full-text article is encouraged. (if
available).
Note: Authors are also encouraged to add other database's unique identifier
(like PUBMED ID).
For Accepted, unpublished papers.
Same as above, but “In press” appears instead of the page numbers.
1. Saha M, Adams ML, Nelson SC. Review of digit fusion in the mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 2009;49(3): (In press).
Note: List the first six authors followed by et al.
Note: Use of DOI number is encouraged (if available).
Note: Authors are also encouraged to add other database's unique identifier
(like PUBMED ID).
For Articles not in English
Forneau E, Bovet D. Recherches sur l'action sympathicolytique d'un nouveau dérivé du dioxane. Arch Int Pharmacodyn. 1933;46:178-91. French.
Personal author(s)
Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Moore PK. Pharmacology. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2003.
Editor(s) or compiler(s) as authors
Beers MH, Porter RS, Jones TV, Kaplan JL, Berkwits M, editors. The Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy. 18th ed. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck Research Laboratories; 2006.
Authored chapter in edited publication
Glennon RA, Dukat M. Serotonin receptors and drugs affecting serotonergic neurotransmission. In: Williams DA, Lemke TL, editors. Foye's principles of medicinal chemistry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
Hugo JT, Mondal SC. Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis: a conceptual framework. Global Health. 2006;16:4. Accessed 29 March 2012. Available: http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/14. Anonymous. Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis: a conceptual framework. Global Health. 2006;16:4. Accessed 29 March 2012. Available: http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/1/1/14.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. A study of digit fusion in the mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 2009;49(2):259–276.
Internationally accepted rules and the international system of units (SI) should be used. If other units are mentioned, please give their equivalent in SI.
For biological nomenclature, the conventions of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria, and theInternational Code of Zoological Nomenclature should be followed.
Scientific names of all biological creatures (crops, plants, insects, birds, mammals, etc.) should be mentioned in parentheses at first use of their English term.
Chemical nomenclature, as laid down in the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry and the official recommendations of the IUPAC-IUB Combined Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature should be followed. All biocides and other organic compounds must be identified by their Geneva names when first used in the text. Active ingredients of all formulations should be likewise identified.
All equations referred to in the text should be numbered serially at the right-hand side in parentheses. Meaning of all symbols should be given immediately after the equation at first use. Instead of root signs, fractional powers should be used.
Subscripts and superscripts should be presented clearly. Variables should be presented in italics. Greek letters and non-Roman symbols should be described in the margin at their first use.
To avoid any misunderstanding zero (0) and the letter O, and one (1) and the letter l should be clearly differentiated.
For simple fractions use of the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line is recommended.
Levels of statistical significance such as: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 do not require any further explanation.
A PDF file of proof will be sent to the corresponding author as an e-mail attachment. Authors will be asked to check any typographical or minor clerical errors in the manuscript at this stage. No other major alteration in the manuscript is allowed. After publication authors can freely access the full text of the article as well as can download and print the PDF file.
Authors are required to pay the sum of Five thousand two Hundred Naira (₦5,500.00) only or its equivalent in US$ for manuscript processing and Ten Thousand Two hundred Naira (₦10,500.00) only or its equivalent in US$ as publication fee.